Week 4
Students work with space simulator
You can also use different pipes or handrails to check how the system works. You can check at different angles and hang different objects on the simulator on weight.

What parts of the foot are most susceptible to injury?
How can you protect your foot?
Try to protect your foot model
- use different materials
- offer the best solution
After the experiments and data obtained, the trainees must protect their foot model with different materials. Let them make linings or a protective coating to protect their model
Sample materials:
- paper
- cardboard
- plastic bags
- textile
- plastic
After repeating the experiments
Assessment of learning outcomes
Project Presentation Structure
During lessons in groups of 2 to 4, students create a STEM-proposed project “Creating astro socks to study the effect of microgravity on the body of astronauts”
Structure and protection of the project
The project consists of the following structural elements:
– Presentation (authors, problem, idea, method of solution, conclusions, prospects are indicated).
– Prototype (created a working prototype of the project during the lessons).
– Answering questions during the defense (project presentation skills and understanding of its relevance)
Project Evaluation Criteria
| Evaluation criteria | Points | Comments | |
| 1 | Formulation of the research problem. Significance and relevance of the problem | ||
| 2 | Correspondence of the set problems, goals and objectives to the subject of the project | ||
| 3 | Structuring the content of the project: consistency and consistency | ||
| 4 | Correspondence of the content to the subject of the project:– the degree of disclosure of the problem;– compliance with the plan. | ||
| 5 | Working prototype | ||
| 6 | Teamwork– during the work on the project, the distribution of roles– during the defense | ||
| 7 | Oratory | ||
| 8 | Answers on questions | ||
| 9 | Creativity | ||
| Number of points |
The following criteria are distinguished for evaluating project work:
1 point – not implemented;
2 points – implemented partially;
3 points – fully implemented.
The maximum number of points for the project is 27 points.
It is recommended to transfer the sum of points for work into traditional evaluation norms according to the following scheme:
Rating “5” (excellent) is given for the amount of 22-27 points. Rating “4” (good) corresponds to the sum of 16-21 points.
Grade “3” (satisfactory) corresponds to the sum of points 11-16 points

