Week 4
Students working with an anemometer with a speed sensor
The table is filled in, but the data is not calculated manually, but using the Arduino controller
Measurement can be carried out with different wind sources:
- using a hairdryer to create wind
- you can go outside
- you can measure the wind speed near the window
| How many revolutions in 1 second,COUNT | Circumference,C | Distance (in cm) traveled per second,COUNT * C | Distance (in cm) traveled in 1 hour,(COUNT * C) *3600 | Distance in km/h,((COUNT * C ) *3600)/100 000 |
Assessment of learning outcomes
Project Presentation Structure
Students create, during lessons in groups of 2 to 4 people, the proposed STEM project “Wind speed analysis using an anemometery”
Structure and protection of the project
The project consists of the following structural elements:
- Presentation (authors, problem, idea, method of solution, conclusions, prospects are indicated).
- Prototype (created a working prototype of the project during the lessons).
- Answering questions during the defense (project presentation skills and understanding of its relevance)
Project Evaluation Criteria
| Evaluation criteria | Points | Comments | |
| 1 | Formulation of the research problem. Significance and relevance of the problem | ||
| 2 | Correspondence of the set problems, goals and objectives to the subject of the project | ||
| 3 | Structuring the content of the project: consistency and consistency | ||
| 4 | Correspondence of the content to the subject of the project:- the degree of disclosure of the problem;- compliance with the plan. | ||
| 5 | Working prototype | ||
| 6 | Teamworkduring the work on the project, the distribution of rolesduring the defense | ||
| 7 | Oratory | ||
| 8 | Answers on questions | ||
| 9 | Creativity | ||
| Number of points |
The following criteria are distinguished for evaluating project work:
1 point – not implemented;
2 points – implemented partially;
3 points – fully implemented.
The maximum number of points for the project is 27 points.
It is recommended to transfer the sum of points for work into traditional evaluation norms according to the following scheme:
Rating “5” (excellent) is given for the amount of 22-27 points. Rating “4” (good) corresponds to the sum of 16-21 points.
Grade “3” (satisfactory) corresponds to the sum of points 11-16 points